Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kandance Wells v. Charleston Area Medical Center System
as 22-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KANDANCE A. WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a/k/a CAMC - System
Wells v. CAMC - System
as 2:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kandance Wells
Defendant:
CAMC - System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
RSUI Indemnity Company v. CAMC Health System, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant:
CAMC Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Kiser v. West Virginia Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00334
Defendant:
Kanawha County Circuit Court, CAMC Hospital, Prime Care Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Kiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CMFG Life Insurance Company v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
CMFG Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
CAMC Neurology, Amy J. Nicholas and St. Mary's Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A. H. et al v. CAMC Health System, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00858
Defendant:
Vandalia Insurance Company, CAMC Health System, Inc., RSUI Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff:
Adriana Flemming and A. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Foster v. Charnock et al
as 2:2014cv24232
Plaintiff:
Carl C. Foster
Defendant:
Ann Charnock, Judge Kaufman, Judge Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovejoy v. CAMC Teays Valley Hospital, Inc.
as 3:2014cv04991
Plaintiff:
Hazel Lovejoy
Defendant:
CAMC Teays Valley Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
