Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Gambino v. Frank Hershberger
as 20-6591
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM GERA, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, 8 JOHN DOE OFFICERS AT FCI CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Mattos et al v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Council 3
as 1:2019cv02539
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ickes, Larry Teets, Melissa Potter and others
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Council 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03872
Plaintiff:
Carol Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gambino v. Dr. Moubarek et al
as 8:2017cv02311
Plaintiff:
David A. Gambino
Defendant:
Dr. Moubarek, Carol Miller, Kristi Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Gambino v. Dr. Moubarek
as 16-6647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MOUBAREK, MD, CAROL MILLER, HIT, KRISTI CRITES, CRNP and others
Gambino v. Dr Moubarek et al
as 8:2015cv02202
Plaintiff:
David A Gambino
Defendant:
Dr Moubarek, Carol Miller, Kristi Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30633
Plaintiff:
Glenda Carol Miller and Thomas E. Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19445
Plaintiff:
Carol Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller-Willis v. Coloplast Corporation
as 2:2013cv23897
Plaintiff:
Carol Miller-Willis
Defendant:
Coloplast Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
