Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Army Navy Country Club v. LS Interiors, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Army Navy Country Club
Defendant:
LS Interiors, LLC, Lisa Diane Stanley, Lisa D. Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Stanley v. Pressley et al
as 5:2019cv01426
Defendant:
Sara Thacker, Nardia Pressley and Curtis Brown
Plaintiff:
Aaron D Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Green v. North Carolina Dept of Corr
as 13-7819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARLTON B. JOYNER, TRESA BROWN TOMLINSON and others
Stanley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17332
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Stanley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv08469
Plaintiff:
Connie D. Stanley and Kenneth H. Stanley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09501
Plaintiff:
Audria D. Stanley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. North Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011ct03175
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Green
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Corrections, Carlton B. Joyner, Tresa Brown Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Stanley et al
as 2:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Bettye D. Stanley, Lorraine Chapman, Dr. Harler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
John D. Stanley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
