Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. H. Clarke
as 20-6529
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT D. WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HARLEY COLNA, CORRECTIONS OFFICER FELTS, LIEUTENANT EVANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6665
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O J. ROSENBAUM, DOSS, NURSE MS. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Dennis v. Wells
as 1:2019cv00918
Plaintiff:
Antoine Dennis
Defendant:
Clementine D. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv02583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wells et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02506
Plaintiff:
Lauren D. Wells and Sharon Wells
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Gregg-El v. John Doe
as 17-6493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGG-EL, a/k/a Charles Gregg
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Health Services Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. WHITED, RNCB; Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. SANDIFER, Institutional Ombudsman; Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017md02775
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Wells et al
as 2:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer D. Wells and Sgt. Gaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv07597
Plaintiff:
Roxanne D. Wells and Timothy Wells
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28600
Plaintiff:
Cindy D. Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
