Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Baire v. Winters et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Rickey Baire
Defendant:
Zachary Winters, Adam Mason and The City of Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Dodson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01373
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dodson, Nannie Dunbar, Colleen Dunwoody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reese v. Hannah et al
as 2:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Todd Hannah, Zachary Winters, The City of Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwonne Washington v. R. S. Dunbar
as 23-7203
Petitioner / Appellant:
DWONNE A. WASHINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD S. DUNBAR, Warden
Demurjian v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Richard Demurjian
Defendant:
Lee Dunbar and Harford County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
Dunbar Jr. v. Stonebreaker
as 9:2023cv05323
Petitioner:
Joseph Wadell Dunbar Jr.
Respondent:
Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. R.S. Dunbar, Warden
as 0:2023cv04464
Petitioner:
Dwonne Washington
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
