Cases 1 - 10 of 7,321
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Ronald Jenkins, Jr.
as 24-174
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD DAMONE JENKINS, JR., a/k/a G, a/k/a GG, a/k/a Gee, a/k/a Gee Gee
Robbie Plyler v. Russell Cox
as 24-1445
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE G. PLYLER and DEBORAH PLYLER
Defendant:
COX BROTHERS FARMS, a North Carolina general partnership, RUSSELL F. COX, DELANO S. COX and others
Huffman v. Helton et al
as 7:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Kayla Helton, Nurse A. Grizzle, Nurse G. Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akeem Mason v. Robin Wallace
as 24-6423
Plaintiff:
AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant:
ROBIN WALLACE, Lieutenant, Shift Commander, JOSEPH G. CARR, Lieutenant, Training Shift Commander and CAPTAIN LUCY, Supervisor
White v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Barry G. White
Defendant:
Christopher M. Cummings and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
G.B. et al v. Wood County Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
G. B., C.T. and M.T.
Defendant:
Wood County Board of Education and Tena Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 15043 Developmental Disabilities & Bill of Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
