Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Eric Bonetti v. City of Alexandria, Virginia
as 21-1820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC J. BONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA, ROBERT HILLER MALM, EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA and others
Bonetti v. Clifford et al
as 1:2021cv00728
Defendant:
Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, St. Gabriel's Episcopal Church and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Bonetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bonetti v. City of Alexandria, Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Bonetti
Defendant:
Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, Grace Episcopal Church, Robert Hiller Malm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiller v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Hiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hillers v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 4:2018cv02051
Defendant:
Paula Richardson, South Carolina Department of Social Services and Wanda Squires
Plaintiff:
Angela Hillers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barajas v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2018cv00229
Plaintiff:
David Barajas
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and Randy Hiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castaneira v. Arnold et al
as 5:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Castaneira
Defendant:
S. Andrew Arnold, Matthew Yanni, Berkeley County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiller v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07269
Plaintiff:
Angel Hiller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hiller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06320
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Hiller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
