Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hoff v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Hoff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections, Bohrer and Swope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Straub et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02143
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Straub, Anthony Hill, William Tomsic, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kenneth Shannon v. C. Laird
as 23-6306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH KENNEDY SHANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MICHAEL LAIRD, BRANDAN MCSHEEHY, Special Agent Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA"), DAVID LESLIE, T.F.O. and others
Shannon v. Laird et al
as 2:2022cv04318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kennedy Shannon
Defendant:
C. Michael Laird, Brandan McSheehy, David Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoff v. Clear et al
as 7:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hoff
Defendant:
Stephen Clear, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Captain Josh Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Greene
as 1:2021cv02538
Plaintiff:
David Hoff
Defendant:
Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hoff et al v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 1:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Hoff, Stacy Hoff and Stacy Kellaway
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Hoff, Sartin, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hatfield v. Hoff
as 2:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Thomas Hoff
Plaintiff:
Amey Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Perry et al v. Hoff
as 2:2019cv00470
Defendant:
Thomas W. Hoff
Plaintiff:
Meghan Perry and Randy G. Perry
Not Yet Classified:
LM General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
