Cases 1 - 10 of 27,552
GATEWOOD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
ERIC GATEWOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert v. Kruly et al
as 8:2024cv01608
Plaintiff:
Brittany L. Herbert
Defendant:
Charles Mark Kruly, William M. Skretry and Jeremiah J. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Asbury v. USA
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Terickus J. Asbury
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Asbury v. USA
as 3:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Terickus J. Asbury
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Doe et al v. Dr Phinnize J Fischer Middle School et al
as 6:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Dr Phinnize J Fischer Middle School, Greenville County Schools, Olivia G Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
