Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Joseph D. Bateman, David Anderson, River North Correctional Center MDT Team and others
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
J'on Staton and Cree Faulkner
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, Christopher Hicks, Nicholas Kirkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Richardson
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tyrone J. Hicks
Defendant:
LT Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv04577
Plaintiff:
Lem Douglas Vaughan, III
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Medical Mrs. Bell, Officials K. Hornberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brazil v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv03921
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Brazil, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Correctional Officer Tutherow and Chief Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ballard v. Thompson et al
as 5:2021ct03341
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Thompson, Sgt. Nelson, S. Attiogbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gary Wall v. E. Rasnick
as 21-6553
Defendant / Appellee:
H. CLARKE, Director of VADOC, B. AKERS, Correctional Officer of R.O.S.P., L. BRYANT, Correctional Officer of R.O.S.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY WALL
Jennings v. York County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00312
Defendant:
CO Mobley, Catawba Mental Health, Sgt M Hewitt and others
Plaintiff:
Nuke Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White, Sr. v. Salisbury Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01150
Defendant:
Salisbury Police Department, Tyrone Boyce, Detective J. Hick and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Darnell White, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
