Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
US v. Terry Cox
as 20-4224
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY JAMES COX
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Macon v. Anderson County Tax Depositor et al
as 8:2018cv01036
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Macon
Defendant:
Anderson County Tax Depositor, Anderson Court, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargo et al v. Xylem Tree Experts, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Evan Vargo , James Cox , Kenneth Stewart and others
Defendant:
Xylem Tree Experts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cox et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02660
Plaintiff:
James Cox , Michelle Cox and Betty Redding
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05874
Plaintiff:
Miranda Diane Cox and James Cox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel-Cox et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05326
Plaintiff:
Donna McDaniel-Cox and James Cox
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
