Cases 1 - 10 of 7,680
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Harmon Badge 0156 et al
as 8:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Beneficiary to Angela T Williams
Defendant:
Harmon Badge 0156, Cedric Heyward, McDonald's Tow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walsh et al v. The City of Clarksburg
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mark Walsh, Neal Aldrich, Frank Barberio and others
Defendant:
The City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Azim et al
as 1:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
Gary Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Mariam Azim, Dr. Rudy Murillo, Dr. Margaret Boverman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
US v. Ibrahim Oudeh
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DR. IBRAHIM OUDEH, HANAN KHAROUFEH, THE NAIM TRUST and others
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, -DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, SERGEANT HESTER and others
Jones v. Smith
as 9:2024cv03624
Plaintiff:
Rosalind G Jones
Defendant:
Bonnie S Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Corvin Young v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility
as 24-6595
Plaintiff:
CORVIN J. YOUNG
Defendant:
SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, County Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
