Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Barricks v. Wright
as 7:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Barricks
Defendant:
James R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Wright v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 22-7357
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES TYTIL WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Wright v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2022cv01102
Petitioner:
James Tytil Wright
Respondent:
Broad River Correctional Inst and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Warden of Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution
as 8:2021cv00388
Petitioner:
James L. Wright
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hatfield v. Wright
as 7:2018cv00494
Defendant:
James D Wright, Jr
Plaintiff:
Robert Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Unitedhealthcare
as 1:2015cv01641
Plaintiff:
James K. Wright
Defendant:
Unitedhealthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1161
James L. Wright v. Karen D. Brown
as 15-7896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LEROY WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN D. BROWN, Chair Virginia Parole Board, sued in their official capacities, ALGIE T. HOWELL, Vice Chairman Virginia Parole Board, sued in their official capacities, DR. A. LINCOLN JAMES, Member Virginia Parole Board, sued in their official capacities and others
Wright v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv01348
Plaintiff:
James L. Wright
Defendant:
Karen D. Brown, Algie T. Howell, Dr. A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv05927
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Wright
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America NA v. Wright
as 5:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
James W Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
