Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tony Messer v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC
as 21-2363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. MESSER, PHILIP E. BARBROW, BENJIE G. HICKS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COMPRESSOR, INCORPORATED, trading as Bristol Compressors
Defendant:
GARRISON INVESTMENT GROUP, LP
Smith v. Piedmont Regional Jail
as 2:2019cv00259
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messer et al v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Vestal, William C. Church, David Estep and others
Defendant:
Garrison Investment Group, LP and Bristol Compressors International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Smith, Jr. v. Hasselman
as 1:2015cv00917
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Hasselman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Lewis et al
as 5:2011ct03174
Plaintiff:
David A. Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, George Kenworthy, Unit Manager Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Smith et al
as 5:2011ct03089
Plaintiff:
David A. Hoskins
Defendant:
James E. Smith, Ashlie N. Cox, Sergeant McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeSueur-Richmond Slate Corp. v. Damien Fehrer
as 11-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESUEUR-RICHMOND SLATE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
DAMIEN C. FEHRER, JAMES E. SMITH, VERNON L. HARRIS and others
Fisher v. Smith
as 2:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
James T. Fisher
Defendant:
James E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
