Cases 1 - 10 of 2,827
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Steen v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steen
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company, Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company, The, Employee Benefits Committee of the Sonoco Retirement & Savings Plan, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Marine Corps et al
as 7:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Marine Corps and John - Jane Does 1 -50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Adonnis Shepheard, Sr. v. Shelby Searls
as 24-6451
Plaintiff:
ADONNIS R. SHEPHEARD, SR.
Defendant:
SHELBY SEARLS, Warden, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Nurse and others
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Richard Kaul v. James Oetken
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JAMES PAUL OETKEN, in his personal and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
