Cases 1 - 10 of 67
US v. John Speagle, Sr.
as 24-4361
Defendant:
JOHN ANDREW SPEAGLE, SR.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dobbins v. Bowser et al
as 1:2024cv01192
Defendant:
Elisa Moore, Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser and others
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Dobbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roxanne Davenport Greschner et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00755
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Davenport Greschner and John Andrew Greschner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wyatt v. Holmes
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Wyatt
Defendant:
Officer Trevor Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04586
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Andrews, Donald Smith, Cornell Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Turner et al v. MGI Leasing, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert Turner and Peggy Turner
Defendant:
MGI Leasing, Inc. and John Andrew Goff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hartman v. Lanham
as 3:2022cv00136
Petitioner:
John Andrew Hartman
Respondent:
Brian Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUDLOCK v. USA
as 1:2021cv00724
Petitioner:
JOHN ANDREW MUDLOCK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02004
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Robinson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. John Pipkin
as 21-6527
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ANDREW PIPKIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
