Cases 1 - 10 of 4,889
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eco Fiber Inc. v. Yukon Packaging, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Eco Fiber Inc.
Defendant:
Yukon Packaging, LLC, Zone 1 Consulting, Christopher James Poore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
Respondent:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor:
Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Exum v. Kane et al
as 8:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Jakia Exum
Defendant:
Kevin Ian Kane, Esq., Offit Kurman, PA and BDMG Crestleigh Owner, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wells Fargo Commercial Distribution Finance, LLC v. Pair
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Commercial Distribution Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Kevin W. Pair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Anderson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Kevin Jones
as 24-4249
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN RONREGUS JONES, a/k/a Suffolk Ron
Eco Fiber Inc. v. Vance
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Eco Fiber Inc.
Defendant:
David Kevin Vance
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
