Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jennell Black v. Russell Alexander
as 22-1477
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNELL BLACK, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anton Black, ANTONE BLACK, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anton Black, KATYRA BOYCE, as mother and next of friend of W.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL ALEXANDER, individually, and in his official capacity as Assistant Medical Examiner of the State of Maryland and DAVID FOWLER, in his individual capacity as former Chief Medical Examiner for the State of Maryland
Defendant:
THOMAS WEBSTER, IV, MICHAEL PETYO, in his individual capacity as former Greensboro Police Chief, GARY MANOS, in his individual capacity as former Chief of the Ridgley Police Department and others
Black et al v. Alexander et al
as 1:2020cv03644
Plaintiff:
Jennell Black, Katyra Boyce, Coalition for Justice for Anton Black and others
Defendant:
Pamela Southall, Thomas Webster, IV, David Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bailey v. University of Oxford et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jay Bailey
Defendant:
University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, The Dons of Oxford and Cambridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lannon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21514
Plaintiff:
Joyce Lannon
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANNON v. COMMERCIAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2011cv00945
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY VICTORIA LANNON
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spencer v. Shatley et al
as 1:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Spencer
Defendant:
Shatley, Crary, Bull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
