Cases 1 - 10 of 663
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Box Alarm Leather, LLC v. Manuel
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Box Alarm Leather, LLC
Defendant:
Michael B. Manuel doing business as The Hideout doing business as Royce Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sidney Michael Lee et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Michael Lee, Marshall Earl Harris, Demetrius Lenard Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Randy Dingle v. Benjamin Khan
as 23-1329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN KHAN, Judge, TIMOTHY J. PETERKIN, Attorney, RICHARD MARTIN HUTSON, II, Trustee and others
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Sapp v. 11th Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
11th Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office, Lexington, County of, South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Sapp v. Wilfong et al
as 3:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Michael B. Wilfong, S.R. Blair, Lexington, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gilland v. Sunflower Bank NA
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Gilland
Defendant:
Sunflower Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Drummond, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Elliott Drummond, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael B. Williams, Warren Smith, Henry Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
