Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Milburn Colliery Company v. David Williams
as 22-1938
Petitioner:
MILBURN COLLIERY COMPANY
Respondent:
DAVID S. WILLIAMS and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman v. Bonilla et al
as 1:2019cv02868
Defendant:
Josh Skall, Matthew Milburn, Manuel Bonilla and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00606
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
West Town Bank & Trust v. Edward Fangman
as 16-3138
Petitioner:
WEST TOWN BANK & TRUST, a/k/a West Town Savings Bank
Respondent:
EDWARD J. FANGMAN, VICKIE FANGMAN, DAMON M. OLIVER and others
Capacity Builders, Inc. v. Richard Milburn Academy/Texas Inc.
as 1:2015cv01244
Plaintiff:
Capacity Builders, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Milburn Academy/Texas Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milburn v. Colvin
as 8:2015cv01740
Plaintiff:
Shante Milburn
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Genuine Title, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01235
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Consumer Protection Division
Defendant:
Gary Klopp, All County Settlements, LLC and Carroll Abstracts, Inc.
Movant:
Edward Fangman , Vickie Fangman , Damon M. Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Milburn-Estes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02609
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Milburn-Estes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
