Cases 1 - 10 of 4,189
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant:
Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feagin v. Bass et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Christopher Feagin
Defendant:
Bass, Nabong, Baton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Miller et al v. Leidos, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Andujar Miller and Rasoul Nicholson
Defendant:
Leidos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
