Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dean et al v. Barrow et al
as 8:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Dean and Diamond Morris-Lee
Defendant:
Cory Barrow, Unknown Members of the City of Anderson Police Department, Anderson Police Department, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Harper v. Superintendent Warden
as 5:2022hc02099
Petitioner:
Morris Lee Harper
Respondent:
Superintendent Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris Harper v. Superintendent Warden of Jail
as 22-6370
Petitioner / Appellant:
MORRIS LEE HARPER
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT WARDEN OF JAIL and GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF
Harper v. Medical Personel et al
as 5:2022ct03002
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Harper
Defendant:
Medical Personel, Superintendent Warden of Jail, Mr. J. Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Superintendent Warden of Jail et al
as 5:2021hc02237
Petitioner:
Morris Lee Harper
Respondent:
Superintendent Warden of Jail and Greenville County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sims v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv03205
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, Captain John J. MacGillivary, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Allen Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowser v. USA
as 2:2017cv00605
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Morris Lee Bowser, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VAUGHAN
as 2:2016cv00048
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
MORRIS LEE VAUGHAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Morris Randall, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 15-7761
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS LEE RANDALL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Randall v. Clarke
as 3:2014cv00562
Petitioner:
Morris Lee Randall , Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
