Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson et al v. Foodie Vision LLC et al
as 8:2023cv03433
Plaintiff:
Damara Johnson, Da'Reinn Stevens and Delon Wicks
Defendant:
Foodie Vision LLC doing business as Mad Cow Grill, Edgar Reynoso and Neville Nugent
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Johnl White
as 23-4325
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNL KEITH WHITE, a/k/a Mad Max
Joyner v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03335
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Warden Hardee, Mr. Saul, Lead Nurse C. Mad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craven v. Mad Fish SC LLC
as 2:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicholas Craven
Defendant:
Mad Fish SC LLC and Xin Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Michael Gill
as 16-6990
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD GILL, a/k/a Marcus Porter, a/k/a Mad, a/k/a Madden, a/k/a Mangler, a/k/a Manglo
Perez v. Mad Rose, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Mad Rose, Inc. and Naeem Mohd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. REB, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv14130
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Don Kirshner Entertainment Company and Cruvan, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC and others
Defendant:
REB, LLC, Elizabeth A. Butler and Ralph Butler, III
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gunnar Optiks, LLC v. Mad Panda, LLC
as 5:2015cv00420
Plaintiff:
Gunnar Optiks, LLC
Defendant:
Mad Panda, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gunnar Optiks, LLC v. Mad Panda LLC
as 5:2015cv00423
Plaintiff:
Gunnar Optiks, LLC
Defendant:
Mad Panda, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pickens et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12397
Plaintiff:
Helen Madding Pickens and Delbert J. Pickens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
