Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Antony Blinken
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
FEDS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, MARIE BALLERINI-HOUGNON, DONALD CARROLL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CAROL PEREZ, in her official capacity as Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Global Talent Bureau in the Bureau of Global Talent Management at the the U.S. Department of State and others
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Marie Ballerini-Hougnon, Donald Carroll and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken, Department of State, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ball et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08047
Plaintiff:
Dianna Ball and Michael Ball
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Cline, Jr. v. Michael Ball
as 16-6848
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD RAY CLINE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL BALL
Cline v. Ball
as 1:2016cv00040
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Cline, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLINE v. BALL
as 1:2015cv00900
Petitioner:
DONALD RAY CLINE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. BALL
as 1:2014cv00537
Petitioner:
RODNEY NEAL JENKINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. BALL
as 1:2014cv00504
Petitioner:
RODNEY NEAL JENKINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory Lynn Ross v. Superintendent Michael Ball
as 13-6825
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL BALL
Dover v. Ball
as 5:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
Jackie Lee Dover
Respondent:
Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
