Cases 1 - 10 of 686
Nichols v. Wells Fargo & Company Short-Term Disability Plan
as 6:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Rita Nichols
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company Short-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Farris E. Mallo
Respondent:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafontaine v. Standard Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Nichol Ann Lafontaine
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
