Cases 1 - 10 of 16
SMITH et al v. SHOE SHOW, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
SARAH SMITH, JEFFREY MORROW and MICHAEL CRISCO
Defendant:
SHOE SHOW, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHOE SHOW RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, LISA TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Northcutt et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv03301
Plaintiff:
Clinton Northcutt , Bayan Aleksey , James Bryant and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Joseph McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northcutt v. USA
as 4:2016cv00146
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rakeen D. Northcutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Northcutt v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04521
Plaintiff:
Anderia Northcutt
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northcutt et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Judy Kay Northcutt and Barney Paul Northcutt
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Shakeen Northcutt
as 15-4129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAKEEN D. NORTHCUTT
US v. Rakeen Northcutt
as 15-4130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAKEEN D. NORTHCUTT
Northcutt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08897
Plaintiff:
Margot Mercer Northcutt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey Coles v. Ralph Northcutt and Spouse
as 14-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY COLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH NORTHCUTT, Supervisor/Teacher, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, G. ROBINSON, Manager Ombudsman Service Unit and others
Bryan Northcutt v. Cooper Power Systems, LLC
as 13-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN NORTHCUTT
Defendant - Appellee:
COOPER POWER SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
PARADOXE CORPORATION, GAMMA INSULATORS CORPORATION, USA and LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
