Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnette v. Faile et al
as 0:2019cv01416
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lamont Barnette, Lamont Barnette and Mont Barnette
Defendant:
Barry Faile, William J. Nowicki, Esq. and Jason Broughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowicki et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25408
Plaintiff:
Judith Nowicki and John Nowicki
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nowicki v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19908
Plaintiff:
Casey Nowicki
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nowicki v. Natrol, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01870
Plaintiff:
Mary Nowicki
Defendant:
Natrol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Natrol, Inc., Glucosamine/Chondroitin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2014md02528
Consol_plaintiff:
Linda Dao, Troy Eisner, Mary Nowicki and others
Consol_defendant:
Natrol, Inc., Does 1 through 20, Natrol Direct, Inc. and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
Natrol Acquisition Corp.
Nowicki v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00940
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kay Nowicki
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROBINETTE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2011cv00536
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBINETTE
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
