Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Bullock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Timothy Oneal Bullock
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. Tidewater Community College Va Bch et al
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
Tidewater Community College Va Bch, Maria Conston, TCC Computer Club Head (Professor) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
US v. Kenneth Timmons
as 23-6797
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH ONEAL TIMMONS, a/k/a Keno, a/k/a Kino
Garcia et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00528
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Garcia, Michael Kellison, Walter Goble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brown v. Armstead et al
as 9:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
Rachel P. Brown
Defendant:
A. Armstead and F.W. Oneal, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ONeal v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Lavar ONeal
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00441
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Oneal Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Timothy Bullock v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6483
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ONEAL BULLOCK
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Marvin Songlin v. Jeffrey Crawford
as 20-7627
Respondent:
JEFFREY CRAWFORD, in his official capacity as Director of ICA-Farmville Detention Center
Petitioner:
MARVIN ONEAL SONGLIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
