Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outlaw v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
Keith Outlaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Outlaw v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00649
Petitioner:
Shanay Outlaw
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Riddle v. The United States
as 5:2023ct03229
Plaintiff:
Herndon Hunt Outlaw Riddle
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ward v. Correll et al
as 5:2023ct03075
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Ward
Defendant:
Sergeant B. Correll, Lieutenant J. Raymond, Officer Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Outlaw et al
as 5:2022ct03339
Plaintiff:
Reginald Corey Gray
Defendant:
Venetia S. Outlaw, Shakeeba M. Hudson, Lt. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Venetia S. Outlaw, Mr. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle, III v. USA
as 2:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Herdon Hunt Outlaw Riddle, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fordham v. S.J. Outlaw et al
as 2:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Antrell Jermaine Fordham
Defendant:
S.J. Outlaw, Baker, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
