Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Paton v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00439
Defendant:
TINA MARIE PATON and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing, SSA Noticing and SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Paton v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
KATHY B PATON and Kathy B. Paton
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, JOHN DOE and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Redden v. Dr. David Proctor
as 21-7298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE D. REDDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. DAVID PROCTOR, KIMBERLY PATON, TRISTON TENNEY and others
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redden v. Mnuchin et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Dr. David Proctor, Kimberly Paton and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Redden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00720
Defendant:
I-X C.O. John/Jane Does, Kim Paton, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Paton et al
as 3:2018cv00183
Defendant:
Michael Martin and Kimberly Paton
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stohl v. Proctor et al
as 2:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Regis Joseph Stohl
Defendant:
Michael Martin, David Proctor, Kimberly Paton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Mays et al
as 7:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Ronald Evan Mays and Lyle Robert Paton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
