Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Maroz et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Uladzimir Maroz and Tatyana Maroz
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Antony J. Blinken, Embassy of the United States, Warsaw, Poland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Moore, Vernon Moore, Terrence Morlan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
US v. Cassie Poland
as 20-7765
Defendant / Appellant:
CASSIE CHASE POLAND
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Poland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00634
Plaintiff:
Lynette C. Poland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05659
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Poland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014hc02242
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Poland v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv24555
Plaintiff:
Denise Poland
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poland et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv19860
Plaintiff:
Franceszka Poland and Gardon Poland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
