Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Craig R. Fieldings v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03033
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Craig R. Fieldings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fields v. US Dept. of Justice et al
as 0:2019cv01300
Petitioner:
John Fields and John R. Fields
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and US Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fields v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Connie R. Fields
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33584
Plaintiff:
Rowena R. Fields and Billy D. Fields
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipman v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv03080
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Alexandria Nichols Williams, Ben C. Clyburn, Leo Ryan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02151
Plaintiff:
Nancy R. Fields
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Field v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2011cv00049
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Field
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spillman v. Lewis
as 3:2009cv00781
Plaintiff:
Matthew Spillman
Defendant:
R. Fielding Lewis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
General Order Regarding Temporary Exemption from Electronic Public Access Fees (PACER)
as 2:2008mc00131
Petitioner:
Kimberley R. Fields
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
