Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04820
Petitioner:
Robert Davis Smith, Jr and Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01540
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Linda Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis et al v. PJ North Carolina, LLC
as 5:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Bailey Padgett
Defendant:
PJ North Carolina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smith v. Davis
as 2:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Trevor Jared Robinson, Mary J. Hall, Mason Randolph Carlson, II and others
Plaintiff:
Ethelbert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes et al v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00694
Defendant:
Robert Davis, M.D. and Peter Zelinka, M.D.
Plaintiff:
David Hughes and Adrienne Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden Bush
as 17-7632
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert Davis Smith, Jr., #0495
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN BUSH
Smith v. Bush
as 8:2017cv02775
Petitioner:
Robert Davis Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
