Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company et al v. Rand Construction Corporation
as 1:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Exelon Business Services Company, LLC and Exelon Corporation
Defendant:
Rand Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
Mithun Banerjee v. Rand Gelber
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
JUDGE RAND LEWIS GELBER, ADMIN JUDGE SHERRI DEBRA KOCH, JUDGE JOHN CHRISTIAN MOFFETT and others
Banerjee v. Gelber et al
as 8:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Judge Rand Lewis Gelber, Admin Judge Sherri D. Koch, Judge John C. Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KERR v. INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
ADAM KERR
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC., SATURN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., A TIMELY DELIVERY SERVICE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Boswell v. Wofford College et al
as 7:2023cv05467
Plaintiff:
Graham Boswell
Defendant:
Wofford College, Catherine Rand and David Hogsed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rand v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
James H. Rand
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Michael Rand
as 23-6731
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. RAND
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
