Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Phillips v. Thomas et al
as 3:2020cv01341
Defendant:
Taxi Freight, LLC and Ricky Thomas
Plaintiff:
Tammy Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTHEN v. USA
as 1:2019cv01086
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RICKY THOMAS CARTHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARTHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00764
Petitioner:
RICKY THOMAS CARTHEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00020
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
CARTHEN v. USA
as 1:2011cv00879
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RICKY THOMAS CARTHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County
as 09-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR. and CHANTE' N. HODGE, Mrs.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT COUNTY, (local government), STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND STATE TREASURER and others
Chante' Hodge v. St. Mary's County Sheriff's De
as 09-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANTE' N. HODGE, Mrs. and HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.
Plaintiff:
B.S.H. and B.N.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. MARY'S COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, THOMAS HEDDERICH, First Class Detective, WILLIAM RAY, Detective and others
Hodge et al v. Calvert County et al
as 8:2009cv02252
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr. and Chante N. Hodge
Defendant:
Calvert County, State of Maryland, Maryland State Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hodge et al v. St. Mary's County Sheriffs' Office et al
as 8:2008cv02522
Plaintiff:
Chante N. Hodge, Beersheva S. Hodge, Bathsheba N. Hodge and others
Defendant:
St. Mary's County Sheriffs' Office, Thomas Hedderich, William Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
