Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Medical Unit, Officer Freeman and Sgt Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Scott Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Maier v. Campbell et al
as 1:2018cv00217
Defendant:
Bradley Scott Campbell and Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Sharon Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv00569
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John Doe
Plaintiff:
David Scott Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX IMAGING SERVICES INC V. JOSEPH SCOTT CAMPBELL ET AL
as 1:2012cv01365
Plaintiff:
APEX IMAGING SERVICES INC
Defendant:
JOSEPH SCOTT CAMPBELL and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00068
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Bennett v. Campbell et al
as 8:2010cv03202
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Bennett
Defendant:
Scott Campbell and Body Works and Fitness, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Campbell v. Dean et al
as 3:2010mc00044
Interested Party:
Bankruptcy-Lynchburg
Appellant:
David Scott Campbell
Debtor:
David Scott Campbell
Appellee:
Mark H. Dean and Stacy L. Dean
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
