Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Wilson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Kent Scott Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Buckle et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
Larry Buckle, Thomas Clawson, Willie Hunley Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 23-6960
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00353
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023hc02060
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. US Attorney et al
as 5:2023hc02037
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
US Attorney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
