Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ka'lah Martin v. Travis Short
as 23-1588
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KA'LAH MARTIN, a/k/a Kalah Martin
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS SHORT, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, KYLE GABBY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and JEREMIAH HARRELSON, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department
Defendant:
GREGORY SEABOLT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, STEVEN W. MYERS, both individually and in his official capacity as internal Affairs Deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, EDWARD SLAFKY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and others
MARTIN v. SEABOLT et al
as 1:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
KA'LAH (KALAH) MARTIN
Defendant:
GREGORY SEABOLT, STEVEN W MYERS, TRAVIS SHORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01601
Petitioner:
Paul Travis Cox
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frazier v. Cox et al
as 0:2014cv03068
Plaintiff:
Terrence Oneil Thomas Frazier
Defendant:
Travis Cox, Goergia Richey, Harry V Irick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTON et al v. OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
as 1:2011cv00840
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTON , SUZANNE BENTON , WALLACE BARBOUR and others
Receiver:
JON A NANCE
Defendant:
OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Daniels v. Cox et al
as 0:2009cv02544
Plaintiff:
Jermel R Daniels
Defendant:
Travis Cox, Sgt Holtzclaw, Sgt Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Norman v. Lark et al
as 9:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Luke Lark, Sargant Woody, Travis Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
