Cases 1 - 10 of 15
US v. Thomas Ratliff
as 22-4719
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS REED RATLIFF, a/k/a Reed Ratliff
Reed v. Warden, FCI Morgantown
as 5:2022cv00224
Petitioner:
Thomas Reed
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kimberly Elliott v. Graham Stolle
as 21-1444
Defendant / Appellee:
B. THOMAS REED, GRAHAM STOLLE, ROY B. MARTIN, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY C. ELLIOTT
Elliott v. Stolle et al
as 2:2020cv00513
Defendant:
Roy Martin, Graham Stolle, B. Thomas Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatfield v. Reed
as 1:2019cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Reed
Plaintiff:
Stephen Westley Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03394
Plaintiff:
Christine (I) Walker, Joshua (I) Schaule, Jon Frost and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC FIre & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winston v. Robinson et al
as 2:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony Winston
Defendant:
Trevor J. Robinson and B. Thomas Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Gas Transmission, LL v. 76 Acre
as 16-1017
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
76 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN BALTIMORE AND HARFORD COUNTIES, MARYLAND and MARGARET H. KENNY
Defendant:
LAMBERT G. BOYCE, JR., LEDLEY BYRD BOYCE, ROBERT E. BOYER, JR. and others
Columbia Gas Transmission, LL v. Lambert Boyce, Jr.
as 15-2569
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMBERT G. BOYCE, JR., LEDLEY BYRD BOYCE, ROBERT E. BOYER, JR. and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DAVID CAYCE, IV, BETTY JANE CAYCE, WILLIAM R. COLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
