Cases 1 - 10 of 1,944
Tipold v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Rosa C. Tipold
Defendant:
Tony Wayne Ross and Stephanie Dowdy Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Pearson v. Barker
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antonio Yulander Pearson and Tony
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Forrester v. Officer Kemp
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant:
OFFICER KEMP, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and ANDREA MITCHELL
Tati King v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
TATI ABU KING, TONI HEATH JOHNSON and BRIDGING THE GAP IN VIRGINIA
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, KELLY GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia, JOHN O'BANNON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Elections for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
