Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mercier v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00582
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Mercier
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Correll v. Iconic Mortgage Corp.
as 2:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Correll
Defendant:
Iconic Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Warfield v. ICON Advisers, Inc
as 20-1690
Defendant / Appellee:
ICON ADVISERS, INC and ICON DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WARFIELD
Warfield v. ICON Advisers, Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
James Warfield
Defendant:
ICON Distributors, Inc. and ICON Advisers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Camber Ridge, LLC v. ICON Bond Distribution Center Owner Pool 2, LP
as 3:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Camber Ridge, LLC
Defendant:
ICON Bond Distribution Center Owner Pool 2, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gall et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 0:2015cv04837
Plaintiff:
Christian Gall and Cheryl Gall
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Icon Health and Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halloran v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv27004
Plaintiff:
Timothy Halloran
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. , John Doe#1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medlock v. Reebok International LTD et al
as 9:2013cv01833
Plaintiff:
Lisbeth Saunders Medlock
Defendant:
Reebok International LTD and ICON Health and Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
