Cases 111 - 120 of 829,379
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richards v. Schmoker
as 4:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Wayne Schmoker and Executive Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v J.Pay
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
J.Pay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rushing v. Cape Girardeau City Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau City Police Department, Missouri State Police Agency and Cape Girardeau Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunther v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Rex S. Gunther
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. The Kroger Co.,
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McWashington v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Brandon McWashington
Defendant:
Brian G. Curtis, Noe Garza, Melissa A. Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VILLALONA v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06696
Petitioner:
STEVEN VILLALONA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keller v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
James Keller
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
