Cases 81 - 90 of 831,772
Williams v. U.S. et al
as 1:2024cv04769
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3771 Crime Victim's Rights
Hill v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Hill
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Brian Roberts, Richard Jallins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Mackay v. Gunther
as 2:2024cv01573
Petitioner:
David A Jackson-Mackay
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert Allen Murrell et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Murrell
Petitioner:
Sergeant Nanez
Defendant:
County of Riverside, City of Palm Springs, Riverside County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Borla
as 3:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Richard Romero
Respondent:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ferguson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv03537
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ferguson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCARTHY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, SHERRY, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
