Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chief of Police James E. Davis, Officer Miron B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Jackson Police Department, Chief of Police James E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Hooper
as 21-30782
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tommy Lee Wilson
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Dearing v. The Great State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Tommy Lee Taylor, The Mississippi Department of Corrections, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Officer N. Nobles et al
as 1:2020cv00332
Respondent:
Secretary Coleman and Officer N. Nobles
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Officer N. Nobles et al Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division
as 4:2020cv02370
Defendant:
Officer N. Nobles and Secretary Coleman
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2019cv02638
Defendant:
Veterans Affairs and Veterans Administration
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Vannoy
as 5:2019cv00845
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
