Cases 21 - 30 of 12,515
Anderson v. Monroe
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Regional Director Carol Monroe and Carol Maroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adams v. Franklin County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kristeen Brooke Adams
Defendant:
Franklin County, Judge Scott Lee, Landon Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Lula Lee
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana Inc, Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc and Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lambert v. City of Booneville, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Johnie Lee Lambert
Defendant:
City of Booneville, Mississippi, Austin Kidd, D. J. Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Collins v. MOR PPM, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Collins
Defendant:
MOR PPM, Inc. and Gordon Edward Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Riley v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kendra Lee Riley
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
