Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00052
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cochran v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 4:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cochran
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, Jay Clayton and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gray v. Whitaker
as 4:2019cv00147
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker
Plaintiff:
Tarrika Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Director L. Francis Cissna, Secretary Kirstjen Michelle Nielsen, Acting Attorney Gral Matthew Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Stilley v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, Hugh Hurwitz, Warden M. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Stilley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Fernandez v. Whitaker et al
as 7:2019cv00002
Respondent:
Kirstjen M Nielsen, Ryan K Patrick and Matthew Whitaker
Petitioner:
Maria Graciela Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Orlando Garcia, Mike Pompeo, Alia Moses and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00619
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Director GEO Group Inc, Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00615
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Director, Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
