Cases 41 - 50 of 214
Gipson v. Wardlaw Consulting Services Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Wardlaw Consulting Services, Inc., Michael Wardlaw, William Wardlaw and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Gipson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. Kesireddy, et al
as 5:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Jamie Martin, N.P., Michael C Boyars, M.D., Linda L. Walden, D.O. and others
Plaintiff:
Coy L White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Harris County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2019cv02591
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office, John Doe Constable 1, John Doe Constable 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Oran Gipson
as 19-40735
Defendant / Appellant:
ORAN OKEFFE GIPSON, also known as "Keke"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gipson v. USA
as 4:2019cv00643
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Castleman Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Upton's Naturals Co. et al v. Bryant et al
as 3:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Phil Bryant and Andy Gipson
Plaintiff:
Upton's Naturals Co. and The Plant Based Foods Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
as 6:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Richard Calvin Gipson
Defendant:
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11112
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tina Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson v. McCain
as 5:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Frederick D Gipson
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Gray v. Phil Bryant, et al
as 18-60617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BRYANT, Governor, State of Mississippi, JIM HOOD, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, BRIAN RICHARDSON, Mississippi Bureau of Investigations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
