Cases 71 - 80 of 1,361
Thomas v. Tewis
as 22-30662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deanna Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Tewis, Officer, Kirt Arnold, Officer, East Jefferson Levee District Police Department and others
De La Rosa v. Swift Transportation
as 22-40657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Antonia De La Rosa, Arnold De La Rosa, Abigail Moncivais and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, L.L.C.
Roshell v. Arnold et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Daryl Germaine Roshell
Defendant:
James Arnold and Lucas Rheams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Arnold-Anderson v. Direct Chassislink, Inc
as 4:2022cv03286
Plaintiff:
Mattie Arnold-Anderson
Defendant:
Direct Chassislink, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Arnold v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2022cv03332
Plaintiff:
Shantel Arnold
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office, Julio Alvarado and Joseph Lopinto, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Paula Arnold and Brian Arnold
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Herberger v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Herberger
Defendant:
Tyrone Nelson, Arnold Van and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv05199
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arnold v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
Sharon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
