Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Merritt et al v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brad Merritt, Billy Cunningham, Daniel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
Merritt v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ernest P Merritt, II
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Merritt v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Robert Cowan Merritt
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office and Joseph Lopinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly Lake Ranch Association, Inc. v. Emerson et al
as 6:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Holly Lake Ranch Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Philip J. Emerson, Jr., The Estate of Robert Steven Merritt and Barbara Frances Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Merritt v. Texas Farm Bureau
as 24-50127
Plaintiff:
Jerry Merritt
Defendant:
Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Business Corporation, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and others
Johnson v. Prator
as 24-30058
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Chaplain Patin-Hammond, Director Hicks and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Merritt v. Inc. et al
as 1:2023mc01467
Petitioner:
Douglas Merritt
Defendant:
Cribl Inc. and Clint Sharp
Plaintiff:
Splunk, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
