Cases 121 - 130 of 827,828
United States of America v. Lovett
as 4:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Catherine S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default on Loan
Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators, Erick Solares, Matthew Ptashnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Pasco County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Richard Knight
Defendant:
Pasco County Sheriff's Office and Chris Nocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramzan v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
Virginia Lisa Ramzan
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Osmanski v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02846
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Osmanski
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ryhter et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Shelli Ryhter and Jerry Ryhter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schwartz v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stewart
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
